Show me any other philosopher who can write something like “The Diary of the Seducer” by Kierkegaard and I’ll be damned. It is impossible to write anything this sustained, built over this much pathos, which wears a horrible and frightening façade to express a deep and tender hurt. As a secret message to the one you love, to tell her everything that you are not, it borders on the fanatic. We are introduced to the Seducer, who is not a seducer in the normal, paltry sense of the word. He is highly developed beyond the merely physical or the sentimental, light years beyond the childish Casanova or Don Juan. He is not after possession of the body, but the sweet, evanescent smell of infinity. Because he understands the woman more profoundly than all worldly seducers ever can. The woman is like Nature, the flower blooming, the ray of light streaking, the being which is not for itself but for something other than itself. The purity and virginity which is real only in relation to another. She is a vision of the formless infinite, blossoming in a moment. In her lies all the mysteries of love which cannot be put into words, the ineffable, the sigh, the silence, the separation which translates into presence. She is the inexhaustible spring in the abstract, which shimmers and disappears in reality’s mirage. “And from this it can be explained why, when God created Eve, He caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam; for woman is the dream of man.”
But our seducer is the veritable “aesthete”, and he claims for himself the higher calling. From the woman we wants to lure out the power of the erotic, that which was always inside from the very beginning but which must be skillfully brought out lest it degenerate into the worldly and the mundane. He wants to draw out love, not the love of convention but that feminine love which is a golden as spring and fiery as a tempest. It is the power of every woman to smite and overwhelm, and yet also at the same time to also give all and be overwhelmed. And after the sacred beautiful has been brought out, after the woman is in the pitch of a passion that was always hers, then the flicker is left alone and he moves on to the next. When the match is struck it ignites and blazes then slowly wanes, but he will not stay to see it die. The seducer is not in love with any particular woman but with the ideal woman, formed from the harmonized reflections of all young girls, that spectacle which he claims Heaven itself would be envious of. He loves but does not know how to love. He brings out love from the woman for the sake of taste. He lives in the present without a future.
“Johannes!
There was a rich man, he had great herds, and many cattle, small and great; there was a poor little maiden, she had only a single lamb, which ate from her hand and drank of her cup. You were the rich man, rich in all the glories of the earth; I was the poor maiden who had only her love. You took it; you rejoiced in it; then passion beckoned you, and you did sacrifice the little I possessed; of your own you would sacrifice nothing. There was a rich man who owned great herds, and many cattle great and small; there was a poor little maiden who had only her love.
Thy Cordelia.”
===
As I was commuting home this afternoon I saw two rainbows overlapping in the sky, and a glaze of white stretching from both of them to the horizon. Did you know that if you stare long and hard at a rainbow it loses its colors and disappears? So with your life, so with your life.
===
I tried dropping in on the fraternity after a long disappearance, and before my disparaging remarks some self-criticism is required. I clammed up, I regressed. It feels like I cannot be who I am now if you drop me into situations of my past like throwing me into a pool. I fail to reach out, fail to smile, fail to humble myself. I become combative. I sneer. But why? Because in these boys trying hard to be men I see who I was, with all my insecurities, with my false securities. In a culture that espouses little more than green jokes and shallow minds. In attempts at discipline that trip and fail, because this is the phase where boys carrying metal pipes in a bag really only know how to play DotA, and where the principles are as vague as saying you have to be good. The history is a shadow that has no bearing, and brotherhood is as close knit as getting wasted together or a secret handshake.
But why am I so angry? Maybe it is because in truth I have discovered the importance of people as persons, as singular and outlined individuals, but the pretense of brotherhood blocks the way. Pretense, pretense, of connections that were never really there. Brotherhood built on a figment of the imagination. Organizations that believe in a single idea? Idea? The idea does not exist, only the people do. People are more important than any abstract idea, more than any abstract philosophy. People, not the the stimulations brought on by the word, but lives sympathetically touched, are second only to God.
===
Darn. They should really put warning labels on all those TV series compilations. I remember a time when the most you had to worry about was wasting a couple of hours on a movie. But this is going way too far. I think we watched 12 hours of Prison Break just yesterday, and we're on to the second season right now. Waaah!